Proctor Compaction Test

The reference test behind every compaction spec: the Proctor tells you the best density a soil can reach and the moisture it takes to get there, so the field has something honest to be measured against.

the usual spec: 95 percent of maximum dry density, near optimum moisture
Standard ProctorASTM D698, AASHTO T99: 2.5 kg rammer, 305 mm drop, 3 layers, 25 blows
Modified ProctorASTM D1557, AASHTO T180: 4.5 kg rammer, 457 mm drop, 5 layers, 25 blows
Compactive energy600 kNm/m3 standard, 2700 modified, four and a half times more
What it givesmaximum dry density and optimum moisture content
Typical MDD, granular soils1900 to 2200 kg/m3
Typical MDD, fine grained soils1500 to 1800 kg/m3
Typical optimum moisture8 to 12 percent granular, 12 to 20 fine grained
Modified vs standardMDD about 5 to 10 percent higher, optimum 2 to 4 points lower

How the test works

Compact the same soil in a mold at four or five moisture contents and weigh each result. Dry density rises with moisture as water lubricates the particles, peaks, then falls as water starts occupying the space the solids need. The peak of that curve is the maximum dry density and the moisture under it is optimum. Field compaction is then specified as a percentage of that peak, almost always 95 percent standard for general earthworks, with 98 to 100, or modified energy, reserved for pavements and under structures.

Where it goes wrong

The classic failure is comparing field tests against the wrong curve. Borrow pits drift, and a soil that looks the same can carry a different Proctor: when the material changes, a fresh curve or at least a one point check is owed. Gravelly soils need the oversize correction, since rock retained on the 19 mm sieve inflates density without meaning better compaction. And chasing density with water works until it does not: wet of optimum, the roller pumps the ground instead of packing it, and the dry density falls no matter how many passes you buy.

Related Calculators and Reference